McGill v. Lewis

On Petition for Rehearing

For former opinion, see 61 Nev. 34, 116 P.(2d) 581. Gordon W. Rice, of Reno, for Appellants. R. R. Gill, of Ely, for Respondent.

OPINION

By the Court,

Taber, J.:

In their petition for rehearing appellants stress the fact that the judgment in the promissory note case was against the husband alone. This point was not urged in the briefs on appeal. It may further be observed that in Lachman v. Walker, 15 Nev. 422, the judgment, as here, was against the husband only.

But appellants insist that the rule in Lachman v. Walker, supra, is no longer the law of this state. We are…