Legal Opinion

McCoy v. Whirlpool Corp.

District Court, D. Kansas

Decided November 16, 2001No. Nos. 00-2458-JWL, 00-2459-JWL, 00-2461-JWLPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM & ORDER

LUNGSTRUM, District Judge.

This case involves product liability claims brought by the plaintiffs against defendants Whirlpool Corporation (“Whirlpool”), Sears, Roebuck and Co. (“Sears”) and Larry Gobin. The plaintiffs’ claims are based on a variety of theories, including negligence, strict liability, breach of warranties and violation of the Kansas Consumer Protection Act. The plaintiffs allege that a defective dishwasher caused a fire that resulted in the death of their daughter. The matter is currently before the court on the plaintiffs’ motion to dismiss their claims…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Phyllis Zagano v. Fordham University and George N. GordonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1990
  2. Karin Sofia Ohlander, in the Matter of Julia Larson, a Minor Child, F/k/a Karin Sofia Larson v. Mark Andrew LarsonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1997
  3. Phillips Usa, Inc. v. Allflex Usa, Inc., and N.J. Phillips Pty., LimitedCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1996
  4. Terry Clark v. Robert J. Tansy, Warden Attorney General for the State of New MexicoCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1993
  5. Antowyn Cauley v. John WilsonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1985

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Bedrock Quartz Surfaces, LLC v. Rock Tops Holdings LLCDistrict Court, D. Utah · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API