Legal Opinion

Roe v. Smyth

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 17, 1937PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtAdel, J.

The plaintiff is the last of several indorsers of a note indebtedness. After maturity he paid the full amount of the indebtedness to the bank, the holder of the instrument, and took delivery of the note. He then brought suit for the amount he had paid, and succeeded in obtaining reimbursement therefor. He brings the instant action against five prior indorsers to recover the expenses he incurred and actually paid in Collecting the note indebtedness, including a reasonable attorney’s fee. The action is predicated on the following clause, which appears in the note in addition to the usual…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Munn v. President & Directors of Commission Co.New York Supreme Court · 1818
  2. Cram v. HendricksCourt for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors · 1831
  3. Kelly v. . BurroughsNew York Court of Appeals · 1886
  4. Reilly v. . Sicilian Asphalt Paving Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1902
  5. Cox v. HaganSupreme Court of Virginia · 1919

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Roe v. SmythAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API