Legal Opinion

Paragon Plumbing Supply Corp. v. Umansky Plumbing & Heating Co.

New York Supreme Court

Decided December 23, 1938PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtNova, J.

Motion to dismiss complaint as against the defendant Bero Builders, Inc., on the ground that it appears on the face of ■the complaint that it does not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause- of action against said defendant Bero Builders, Inc.

The action is to replevy certain plumbing, and heating materials. Plaintiff is the alleged conditional .vendor of said goods and sues the' vendee, Umansky Plumbing & Heating Co.,' Inc., and1 the *429owner of the premises wherein the goods were affixed, namely, the codefendant Rero Builders, Inc.

The complaint alleges the contract between plaintiff and…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Kohler Co. v. BrasunNew York Court of Appeals · 1928
  2. Dryja v. TwarozynskiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1933

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Simms v. SullivanOregon Supreme Court · 1921

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API