Legal Opinion

Claybrooks v. State

Court of Special Appeals of Maryland

Decided June 7, 1977No. 1151, September Term, 1976PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGilbert, C. J.

The Fifth Amendment to the Constitution of the United States provides that no person shall “be subject for the same offense to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb . ...” Prior to Benton v. Maryland, 395 U. S. 784, 89 S. Ct. 2056, 23 L.Ed.2d 707 (1969), it was generally taken to be true that the Fifth Amendment prohibition was limited to cases involving strictly federal jurisdiction. Palko v. Connecticut, 302 U. S. 319, 58 S. Ct. 149, 82 L. Ed. 288 (1937); State v. Stanley, 34 Md. App. 393, 367 A. 2d 27 (1977). Benton, however, made manifest that the double jeopardy provision of the Fifth…

2Cases cited43 opinions

  1. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Barker v. WingoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Benton v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  4. Palko v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
  5. Bartkus v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1959

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Evans v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1984
  2. Claggett v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1996
  3. Barrios v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1997
  4. Carey v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1979
  5. Gray v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1977

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API