Legal Opinion

Gutierrez v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided July 21, 1999No. 98-2709PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SCHWARTZ, Chief Judge.

Rejecting the appellant’s primary claim of error on this appeal from his conviction for child abuse, we hold that the trial court properly admitted testimony of an ac-knowledgedly qualified expert physician, Dr. Apollo, that, to a “95 percent or more” medical certainty, the injuries sustained by the victim in this case were “consistent” with physical abuse. §§ 90.702, 90.703, Fla. Stat. (1997) (“Testimony in the form of an opinion or inference otherwise admissible is not objectionable because it includes an ultimate issue to be decided by the trier of fact.”); Glendening…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Glendening v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1988
  2. State v. TownsendSupreme Court of Florida · 1994
  3. Farley v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1975
  4. Spradley v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1983

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Lee v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1999
  2. State v. SerceyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2002
  3. Weaver v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API