Legal Opinion · Dissent

Federated Insurance v. Oakland County Road Commission

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 21, 2006No. Docket 126886Published

1DissentWeaver, J.

I dissent from the majority’s holding that the Attorney General may not intervene in this case involving cost recovery for environmental contamination caused by defendant, Oakland County Road Commission. The majority’s holding imposes unprecedented and unsupportable limitations on the Attorney General’s ability to defend the interests of the people of the state of Michigan and to defend the interests of the Michigan Department of Environmental Quality (MDEQ) in the enforcement of Michigan law.

*298I also dissent from the majority’s unprecedented narrowing of who is an “aggrieved party” for the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. National Wildlife Federation v. Cleveland Cliffs Iron Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Mundy v. McDonaldMichigan Supreme Court · 1921
  3. Attorney General ex rel. Lockwood v. MoliterMichigan Supreme Court · 1873
  4. In Re Critchell EstateMichigan Supreme Court · 1960
  5. People v. JohnstonMichigan Supreme Court · 1949

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API