Legal Opinion

Pavlina v. City of Vancouver

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided July 13, 2004No. 30829-1-IIPublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBridgewater, J.

Dennis Pavlina and Gold Medal Group, LLC appeal the imposition of impact fees imposed on them when they obtained a building permit for a commercial building. We hold, consistent with our decision in New Castle Investments, LLC v. City of La Center, 98 Wn. App. 224, 989 P.2d 569 (1999), review denied, 140 Wn.2d 1019 (2000), that although preliminary plat approval occurred in 1988, before the impact fee ordinance was adopted in 1995, the imposition of impact fees was correctly calculated at the time the petitioner applied for the building permit in 2002. We affirm and award attorney fees to the…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Davis v. Department of LicensingWashington Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Wenatchee Sportsmen Ass'n v. Chelan CountyWashington Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Mission Springs, Inc. v. City of SpokaneWashington Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Mission Springs Inc. v. City of SpokaneWashington Supreme Court · 1998
  5. McKay v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1934

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Cingular Wireless, LLC v. Thurston CountyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2006
  2. Cingular Wireless, LLC v. Thurston CountyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2006
  3. Pavlina v. City of VancouverCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2004
  4. McMILIAN v. King CountyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2011
  5. McMilian v. King CountyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2011

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API