Legal Opinion

Monsanto v. Hubshman

New York Supreme Court

Decided June 22, 1927PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtLevy, J.

The pleading alleges that the defendants are indebted to United Silk Mills, Inc., a New Jersey corporation; that plaintiff Culkin, as sheriff of New York county, pursuant to a warrant of attachment duly issued in an action commenced by plaintiff Monsanto against United Silk Mills, Inc., attached and levied upon said indebtedness and duly demanded of defendants that they pay over to him the amount they owe to United Silk Mills, Inc., which the defendants have refused to do; that thereafter an order was made by this court authorizing the commencement of this action against such defendants for…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Castriotis v. . Guaranty Trust Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1920
  2. Whitney v. . DavisNew York Court of Appeals · 1896
  3. Riggi Bros. v. Bank of BarcelonaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1919

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Sturcke v. LinkNew York Supreme Court · 1941

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API