Legal Opinion

Vafes v. Stritikus

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided November 8, 1928No. 6 Div. 977PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BOÜLDIN, J.

The bill is to declare and enforce a resulting or constructive trust in lands. The theory of the hill is that complainant, Dr. A. L. Vafes, was a joint purchaser and contributed one-half the purchase money, hut that, unknown to him, the title was taken in the name of Frisena Stritikus, wife of George Stritikus, the copurchaser.

Complainant seeks to assert a beneficial ownership of one-half interest, and have the property sold for division subject to a mortgage given with complainant’s consent.

Respondents deny the equity of the bill; claim that Prisena Stritikus bought the property…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Sims v. ReinertSupreme Court of Alabama · 1970
  2. Rhyne v. MartinSupreme Court of Alabama · 1974

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API