Vafes v. Stritikus
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
BOÜLDIN, J.
The bill is to declare and enforce a resulting or constructive trust in lands. The theory of the hill is that complainant, Dr. A. L. Vafes, was a joint purchaser and contributed one-half the purchase money, hut that, unknown to him, the title was taken in the name of Frisena Stritikus, wife of George Stritikus, the copurchaser.
Complainant seeks to assert a beneficial ownership of one-half interest, and have the property sold for division subject to a mortgage given with complainant’s consent.
Respondents deny the equity of the bill; claim that Prisena Stritikus bought the property…
2Cited by2 opinions
- Sims v. ReinertSupreme Court of Alabama · 1970
- Rhyne v. MartinSupreme Court of Alabama · 1974