Legal Opinion

Cruz v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided August 16, 2002No. 3D02-2093PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

822 So.2d 595 (2002)

Belgica Nubia CRUZ, Petitioner,

v.

The STATE of Florida, Respondent.

No. 3D02-2093.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

August 16, 2002.

Fisher, Lawrence & Malove and Robert David Malove, Miami, for petitioner.

Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, and Mark Rosenblatt, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.

Before COPE, SORONDO and RAMIREZ, JJ.

Confession of Error

COPE, J.

Belgica Nubia Cruz petitions for a writ of mandamus. The State has properly confessed error.

Defendant-petitioner Cruz is charged with uttering a forged instrument and grand theft. She filed…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Kearse v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2000
  2. State v. WarnerSupreme Court of Florida · 2000
  3. Lynch v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1999
  4. Reynolds v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1997
  5. Stout v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2001

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Albritton v. WhiteDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2007
  2. Charlemagne v. GuevaraDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2016
  3. McDermott v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2002
  4. Walters v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2005
  5. Jimenez v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2016

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API