Herrera v. City of New York
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Dissent
Sullivan, J. P.,
dissents in a memorandum as follows: In my view, appellant’s motion for summary judgment should have *121been granted and the complaint against appellant dismissed. The evidence reflects that the only defect in the sidewalk is the elevation differential of 3A of an inch. Such differentials, without more, have been held to be non-actionable. (Morales v Riverbay Corp., 226 AD2d 271.) “It is settled that ‘[t]he owner of a public passageway may not be cast in damages for negligent maintenance by reason of trivial defects on a walkway, not constituting a trap or nuisance, as a…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- S. J. Capelin Associates, Inc. v. Globe Manufacturing Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1974
- Liebl v. Metropolitan Jockey ClubAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1960
- Morales v. Riverbay Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
- Polanco v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997