Legal Opinion

State v. Guzman

Utah Supreme Court

Decided February 28, 2006No. 20040647PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WILKINS, Associate Chief Justice:

¶ 1 Luis A. Guzman was convicted of aggravated robbery and aggravated kidnapping in connection with a home invasion robbery. On appeal, Guzman challenged the admission of eyewitness certainty evidence. The court of appeals affirmed the trial court’s conviction, and we granted certiorari to review the court of appeals’s decision. We are asked to determine (1) whether the admission of testimony concerning an eyewitness’s subjective certainty of identification violates the Due Process Clause of the Utah Constitution and (2) whether testimony concerning an…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Neil v. BiggersSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. State v. DunnUtah Supreme Court · 1993
  3. State v. RamirezUtah Supreme Court · 1991
  4. State v. LongUtah Supreme Court · 1986
  5. State v. HansenUtah Supreme Court · 2002

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. State v. MaestasUtah Supreme Court · 2012
  2. Benn v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2009
  3. State v. JonesUtah Supreme Court · 2015
  4. State v. ClarkCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2014
  5. People v. LemckeCalifornia Supreme Court · 2021

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API