Legal Opinion

Exchange Bank v. Gardner

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided December 18, 1897PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from Decatur District Court. — Hon. H. M. Towner, Judge. Action in equity for an accounting, and to recover of the defendant C. E. Gardner, fifteen thousand dollars on account of poor investments made by Mm as cashier of the plaintiff bank. There was a hearing on the merits, and a judgment in favor of the defendants for costs. The plaintiffs appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtRobinson, J.

The plaintiff the Exchange Bank of Leon is a co-partnership, which was organized in the year 1888, with a capital of thirty thousand dollars, and is engaged in business at Leon. The partners who composed the firm were the plaintiffs S. W. Hurst, I. N. Clark, H. J. Vogt, Orr Sang, C. S. Stearns, and the defendants 0. E. Gardner and R. D. Gardner. The person last named is the father of his co-defendant, and is made a defendant because he would not join as plaintiff. No relief is asked as against him. Therefore, when we refer to “Gardner,” C. E. Gardner is the person intended. Gardner was…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Toledo Savings Bank v. JohnstonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1895
  2. Charlton v. SloanSupreme Court of Iowa · 1888
  3. Knapp v. EdwardsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1883

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Watt v. German Savings BankCourt of Appeals of Iowa · 1917
  2. Hurter v. LarrabeeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1916
  3. Edinger v. Southern Oil Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1911
  4. Bates v. SeedsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1937

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API