Legal Opinion
Bartolotta v. Bartolotta
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided April 15, 1923Published
1Opinion of the Court
Order reversed on the law, without costs, with leave to plaintiff to renew her application for alimony and counsel fee on proper papers. The moving papers presented on the existing application are insufficient. (See Lake v. Lake, 194 N. Y. 179; Stillman v. Stillman, 199 App. Div. 735.) Kelly, P. J., Manning, Kelby, Young and Kapper, JJ., concur.
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Lake v. . LakeNew York Court of Appeals · 1909
- Stillman v. StillmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1922