Legal Opinion

Peebles v. Commissioner

United States Tax Court

Decided June 29, 1956No. Docket Nos. 50674-50676, 59422UnpublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

David Meade Peebles, et al. 1 v. Commissioner.

Peebles v. Commissioner

Docket Nos. 50674-50676, 59422.

United States Tax Court

T.C. Memo 1956-160; 1956 Tax Ct. Memo LEXIS 142; 15 T.C.M. (CCH) 801; T.C.M. (RIA) 56160;

June 29, 1956

David Meade Peebles and Mary Crockett Peebles, 2912 Cortland Place, Northwest, Washington, D.C., pro se. A. Russell Beazley, Jr., Esq., for the respondent.

MULRONEY

Memorandum Findings of Fact and Opinion

The respondent has determined deficiencies in income tax and additions to the tax as follows:

Year

Docket No.

Petitioner

Deficiency

Additions to Tax

1947

50674

David Meade Peebles

$…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Mauldin v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1951
  2. Farley v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1946
  3. Phillips v. Comissioner of Internal RevenueUnited States Tax Court · 1955
  4. Hibbs v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1951
  5. Rissman v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1946

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. E. Aldine Lakin, J. Lee Mullendore and Cecil M. Mullendore v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1957
  2. Harcum v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 1958

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API