Legal Opinion
In Re the United Conclave B. L. Assn.
New Jersey Court of Chancery
Decided May 5, 1944No. Docket 149/276PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Rose S. Laden excepts to the account of the trustees. The exception relates to certain shares which once belonged to Jacob Fischel and which were the subject of Laden v. United ConclaveBuilding and Loan Association, 134 N.J. Eq. 24.
In August, 1941, the association dissolved and the accountants were appointed trustees to liquidate its assets. The association, as is not uncommon, had no stock ledger or stock transfer book. Its only records of members were the stubs of the stock certificates and the ledger recording members' accounts. As the stubs were not indexed, the officers of the…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- In Re the Appeal of Corn Exchange National Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1931
- Heisler v. SharpNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1888
- In Re GriggsNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1939
- In Re LeonardSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1930
- In Re HazeltineNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1936
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- McGlynn v. SchultzNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1967
- Richards v. MidkiffHawaii Supreme Court · 1964
- Dickerson v. Camden Trust Co.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1947
- Brown v. Fidelity Union Trust Co.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1944
- Van Der Veer v. AmesNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1950
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.