Legal Opinion
Clarke v. Gravatt
District Court, D. Nevada
Decided April 28, 2025No. 2:25-cv-00166Unknown
1Opinion
1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 3 Karyl Clarke, Case No. 2:25-cv-00166-JAD-NJK 4 Petitioner Order Granting Motions to Proceed In Forma Pauperis and Motion for Leave to 5 v. File Documents Electronically and Ordering Petitioner to Show Cause by May 6 Jacqueline Gravatt, et al., 30, 2025, why the Petition should not be Dismissed Without Prejudice 7 Respondents [ECF Nos. 1, 1-1, 8, 9] 8 9 Petitioner Karyl Clarke has filed a Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus under 28 U.S.C. 10 § 2254, moved for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (IFP), and seeks leave to file documents 11…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- O'Sullivan v. BoerckelSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Picard v. ConnorSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Danny BOYD, Petitioner-Appellant, v. S. Frank THOMPSON, Superintendent of the Oregon State Penitentiary, Respondent-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
- Edgar M. Hendricks v. Daniel Vasquez, Warden Attorney General of the State of CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- Martin Valdez, Jr. v. W. MontgomeryCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2019
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.