Legal Opinion

Dunlap v. Savage

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided January 8, 1934No. 6016PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMorgan, J.

This is an action by appellants, against respondents, for damages for breach of contract to do assessment work on a group of nine mining claims and to drive a tunnel therein.

A copy of the contract was attached to the complaint and, by reference, made a part thereof. Respondents demurred to the complaint, on the ground that it did not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action. The demurrer was overruled and an answer was filed in which was incorporated a demurrer to the complaint on the ground stated in that which had been overruled.

At the trial a jury was impaneled, counsel for…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Koch v. GlennIdaho Supreme Court · 1933
  2. Sigler v. WickSupreme Court of Iowa · 1877
  3. Higgins-Jones Realty Co. v. DavisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
  4. Meagher v. HoyleMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1899
  5. New Richmond Land Co. v. IvanovichCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1921

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. SpencerIdaho Supreme Court · 1953
  2. Savage v. StokesIdaho Supreme Court · 1934
  3. Chaney v. Village of MiddletonIdaho Supreme Court · 1937

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API