Legal Opinion

Tisdale v. Lockhart

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided February 18, 1986No. 85-219PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

George Rose Smith, Justice.

This is a pro se petition by the appellant, an inmate in the Department of Correction, for a judgment declaring that the Department has erroneously calculated the earliest date on which the appellant will be eligible for parole. The appellee is the Director of the Department. The trial court agreed with the Department. Our jurisdiction is pursuant to Rule 29(l)(c). We affirm.

In 1970 Tisdale was sentenced to imprisonment for felony convictions. While on parole from that sentence in 1972, he was convicted a second time and received a 21-year sentence that will expire…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Michalek v. LockhartSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1987
  2. Woods v. LockhartSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1987
  3. Abdullah v. LockhartSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1990
  4. Davis v. KelleySupreme Court of Arkansas · 2018
  5. Halfacre v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API