Legal Opinion

Carridine v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided September 25, 1996No. 95-0988PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

Appellant was sentenced as a habitual violent felony offender after pleading guilty to armed burglary and aggravated battery. Because Appellant had no notice that the state would seek to have him declared a habitual offender, we reverse the sentence and remand for resentencing without habitual offender status.

Appellant entered an open plea on the date set for trial; the trial court accepted the plea after verifying that Appellant understood the sentencing guidelines range. Thereafter, but prior to the sentencing hearing, the state filed a notice of its intention to seek enhanced penalty…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Ashley v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1993
  2. State v. WilsonSupreme Court of Florida · 1995
  3. Gilbert v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1996

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Williams v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API