Legal Opinion

Bowen v. Bank of Norcross

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided May 16, 1928No. 6184PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtBussell, C. J.

A motion for new trial was made during the term at which the verdict was rendered, and a rule nisi was issued. On the same day an order was passed providing: “The claimant having made a motion for a new trial in the above-stated case, on the grounds therein stated, and it appearing that it is impossible to make out and complete a brief of the testimony in said case before adjournment of court: it is ordered by the court that said motion be heard and determined on the 9 day of April, 1927, at 11 o’clock a. m., in vacation, at Athens, Georgia, and that movant may amend said motion at any time…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Atlanta, Knoxville & Northern Railway Co. v. StricklandSupreme Court of Georgia · 1902
  2. Napier v. HeilkerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1902
  3. Luke v. LukeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1924
  4. Phœnix Bank v. ShirlingSupreme Court of Georgia · 1916
  5. Jackson v. HunterSupreme Court of Georgia · 1920

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Trammell v. MatthewsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1952

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API