Bowen v. Bank of Norcross
Supreme Court of Georgia
1Opinion of the CourtBussell, C. J.
A motion for new trial was made during the term at which the verdict was rendered, and a rule nisi was issued. On the same day an order was passed providing: “The claimant having made a motion for a new trial in the above-stated case, on the grounds therein stated, and it appearing that it is impossible to make out and complete a brief of the testimony in said case before adjournment of court: it is ordered by the court that said motion be heard and determined on the 9 day of April, 1927, at 11 o’clock a. m., in vacation, at Athens, Georgia, and that movant may amend said motion at any time…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Atlanta, Knoxville & Northern Railway Co. v. StricklandSupreme Court of Georgia · 1902
- Napier v. HeilkerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1902
- Luke v. LukeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1924
- Phœnix Bank v. ShirlingSupreme Court of Georgia · 1916
- Jackson v. HunterSupreme Court of Georgia · 1920
3Cited by1 opinion
- Trammell v. MatthewsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1952