Legal Opinion

State v. Belew

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided October 15, 1883PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from Howell Circuit Court. — IIon. J. R. Woodside, Judge.

1Opinion of the Court

Philips, C.

The defendant, W. L. Belew, was indicted in the Ilowell circuit court for perjury. On arraignment he filed motion to quash, assigning as grounds thereof: 1st, Because there is no offense charged in the indictment; 2nd, Because the court is not informed in what issue or trial the alleged perjury was committed; 3rd, Because the indictment is an absurdity on its face. The court sustained the motion and quashed the indictment. The State appeals from this judgment.

*585i. pleading, criminal: demurrer. It is argued by the Attorney General for the State that the first and third grounds of the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. People v. PhelpsNew York Supreme Court · 1830
  2. State v. WeeksSupreme Court of Missouri · 1883

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Gray v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1910
  2. State v. BrownMissouri Court of Appeals · 1912

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API