Legal Opinion
LULU SHRINERS v. TOWNSHIP OF WHITEMARSH
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided August 31, 2021No. 2:20-cv-01720Unknown
1Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA LULU SHRINERS, CIVIL ACTION Plaintiff, NO. 20-1720-KSM v. TOWNSHIP OF WHITEMARSH, et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM Marston, J. August 31, 2021 Plaintiff LuLu Shriners has sued Whitemarsh Township, the current members of the Township Board of Supervisors,1 and Township Manager, Richard Mellor Jr. (the “Township Defendants”), along with Township Solicitor, Sean Kilkenny,2 for the enactment of Ordinance No. 995, which prohibits the display of wild and exotic animals within the Township. Shriners argues that the ordinance…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- In Re Burlington Coat Factory Securities Litigation. P. Gregory Buchanan, Jacob Turner and Ronald AbramoffCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1997
- Amoco Production Co. v. Village of GambellSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Nixon v. Administrator of General ServicesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Stanford Shane Otis Terrell Robert Stewart v. William Fauver, Commissioner James Barbo, Administrator Rogers, Chief Director of CustodyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2000
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.