Cohen v. Mahoney
New York Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtSteuer, J.
The allegations of the complaint are confused by the pleader’s insistence on imposing upon the facts the legal consequences he desires to result. The complaint alleges that plaintiff and the individual defendant agreed to go into business together and it does state that they termed their relationship a partnership. Simultaneously there came into being an entity, now a defendant, called Appellate Press, Inc., described in the complaint as an “ organization * * * not sufficiently completed to form either a corporation de jure or a corporation de facto, * * * but nevertheless a distinct legal…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Boag v. ThompsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1924
- Drucklieb v. Sam H. Harris, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1913
- Thomashefsky v. EdelsteinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1920
3Cited by2 opinions
- DeBoy v. HarrisCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1955
- Epstein v. LeibnerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1940