Legal Opinion

Barker v. Lichtenberger

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided September 18, 1894No. 5140PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from the district court of Douglas county. Heard below before Doane, J. Koehler v. Dodge, 31 Neb., 328; Bassett v. Avery, 15 O. St., 299; Simon v. Merritt, 33 la., 537; Sehawaeker, 50 Ind., 592; Kimey v. Kruse, 28 Wis., 183; Hogan v. Moore, 48 Ga.,, 156; Peabody v. Rees, 18 la., 571; Bank of Sonoma County v. Gove, 63 Cal., 355. Davis v. Neligh, 7 Neb., 78.

1Opinion of the Court

Irvine, C.

The appellant Barker brought this action to foreclose two mortgages on the same property. One of these mortgages was made by Alvadus H. Mayne to Barker to secure certain notes. The property thereafter by mesne conveyances passed to Lichtenberger. The decree foreclosed this mortgage, and *752as to that part of it there is no controversy. The other mortgage was given by Lichtenberger to Clifton E. Mayne to secure three notes made by Lichtenberger to Mayne, each dated February 7, 1888, each for $231.50, with interest at eight per cent from date, and payable, respectively, one, two, and…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Koehler v. DodgeNebraska Supreme Court · 1891
  2. Davis v. NelighNebraska Supreme Court · 1878

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Dunham v. PetersonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1896
  2. Iowa Nat. Bank v. ShermanSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1903
  3. Dorr v. MeyerNebraska Supreme Court · 1897
  4. Douglass v. BurtonNebraska Supreme Court · 1915
  5. Kehm v. German Mutual Insurance, Court of Common Pleas of Ohio, Hamilton County1901

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API