Grant v. Dortch
Court of Appeals of Kentucky
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MeANULTY, Judge.
This is a pro se appeal from an order of the Butler Circuit Court, holding Appellant Michael Grant in contempt for comments made concerning the trial court in a letter addressed to an attorney and courtesy copied to the trial court. Because we find that Appellant was not afforded due process in the hearing, we vacate and remand for a new hearing.
Appellant is an inmate legal aide and was assisting a fellow inmate, Michael Bel-cher, in his attempt to gain visitation rights with his child. In the course of Mr. Belcher’s litigation, a letter signed by Appellant was mailed…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Bloom v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Cooke v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
- Ex Parte TerrySupreme Court of the United States · 1888
- Commonwealth v. BurgeKentucky Supreme Court · 1997
- Gordon v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1911
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Newsome v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 2001
- Vondregus Bailey v. Commonwealth of KentuckyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 2022