Legal Opinion

Doyle v. Chladek

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided April 21, 1965Published

1Opinion

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING

*614King, Miller, Anderson, Nash & Yerke and Fredric A. Yerke, Jr., and Jean P. Bowman, Portland, for the petition. Edward M. Murphy and Gordon G. Carlson, Rose-burg, contra. Before McAllister, Chief Justice, and Perry, Sloan, O’Connell, Goodwin, Denecke and Holman, Justices. HOLMAN, J.

Defendants Kring and Huston have filed a petition for rehearing raising the sole question of the propriety of the court’s decision (Doyle v. Chladek, 240 Or 598, 401 P2d 18), in assessing interest on the amounts of the judgments from November 16, 1960, the day the subscription agreements…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Doyle v. ChladekOregon Supreme Court · 1965

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API