Legal Opinion
United States v. Pedro Dyck, Also Known as Pedro Dyck-Peters.
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided July 1, 2003No. 03-1308PublishedCited by 31 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HANSEN, Circuit Judge.
Following a jury trial, Pedro Dyck was convicted of illegal reentry after deportation subsequent to an aggravated felony conviction in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a) and (b). At sentencing, the district court granted Dyck an aceeptance-of-responsibility reduction and several downward departures. The government ap peals the sentence, we vacate it, and remand for resentencing.
I
In February 2002, the Immigration and Naturalization Service (“INS”) ordered that Dyck be permanently removed from the United States after he was convicted of a federal drug-trafficking offense for…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Koon v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- United States v. CrawfordCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1994
- United States v. Santiago Maul-ValverdeCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1993
- United States v. Ramon Gonzalez-ChavezCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1997
- United States of America, Appellant/cross-Appellee v. Michael T. Petersen, Appellee/cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2002
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- Luis Fernando Padilla v. Alberto GonzalesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2005
- United States v. MikutowiczCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2004
- United States v. Antonio Alberto SebastianCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2006
- United States v. PressleyCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2003
- United States v. Casey Scott PattenCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2005
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.