Tetrault v. O'Connor
North Dakota Supreme Court
Appeal from District Court, Pembina County; Sauter, J. ActN.u ¡' Joseph Tetrault against A. M. O’Conner. Plaintiff had judgment, and defendant appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtBartholomew, J.
Action of conversion against a sheriff for the value of a stock of goods seized and sold by the officer, but of which plaintiff claims to have been the owner. The officer justified under a writ against plaintiff’s vendors. The only issues related to the ownership of the goods and their value. There was a verdict for plaintiff, a new trial was denied, judgment upon the verdict, and defendant appeals.
Plaintiff’s vendors had been doing business as merchants. They ■nade an assignment for the benefit of creditors. From that assignment they reserved goods valued at $1,500 as their exemptions under…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Bowman v. EppingerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1890
- Colby v. McDermontNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1897
- Taylor v. RiceNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1890
3Cited by9 opinions
- Buchanan v. Occident Elevator Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1916
- Madson v. RuttenNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1907
- First National Bank v. Red River Valley National BankNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1900
- State v. StevensSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1902
- Ward v. McQueenNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1904
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.