Legal Opinion · Dissent

Dadourian Export Corporation v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided June 5, 1961No. 313, Docket 26699Published

1DissentFriendly, Circuit Judge

In my view plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment should have been granted and the Government’s denied.

Understanding of this case seems to me to demand fuller statement of the Government’s invitation and of plaintiff’s bid than the majority’s. Not one but three groups of cargo nets, Items 53 to 58, 59 to 64, and 65 to 73, were offered. They were respectively described as follows:

“Nets, Cargo, 12'xl2', Meshes 8" Square, frame of 3% circ fiber rope netting of 3" circ fiber rope with lanyards loose (Unused)

“Nets, Cargo, 18’ long x S' wide Meshes 8" sq frame of 3% circ fiber rope netting of 3"…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Clearfield Trust Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  2. Pope v. AllisSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
  3. United States v. SilvertonCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1952
  4. FRIGALIMENT IMPORTING CO., LTD. v. BNS International Sales Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1960
  5. New York, N.H. & H.R. Co. v. Reconstruction Finance CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1950

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API