Koops v. Gregg
Supreme Court of Connecticut
1Opinion
The plaintiff filed a motion to reargue this case, restricted to a claim that the rescript, instead of directing unqualifiedly a new trial, should limit the retrial solely to the issue whether the defendant Tweedy in operating the car at the time of the accident was acting as the agent of Mrs. Gregg. This was the only issue as to which, upon the appeal to us, any error was claimed. The motion was granted and on the reargument Mrs. Gregg's counsel agreed that this might well be done, unless this court would direct that judgment in the trial court be rendered in her favor. As this case was…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Murray v. KrenzSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1920
- Smith v. WhittleseySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1906
- Fay v. Hartford & Springfield Street Railway Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1909
- Porter v. TaylorSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1927