Legal Opinion
State v. Lee
Arizona Supreme Court
Decided April 3, 1939No. Criminal No. 868PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtLockwood, J.
Jim Lee, hereinafter called respondent, was informed against by the county attorney of Santa Cruz county for the crime of “hit and run driving”. The information, so far as material for a consideration of this case, reads as follows:
“The said Jim Lee . . . (was) then and there driving a certain vehicle, to-wit, a certain Ford coupe, upon a public highway, ... at which time and place one Charles Brown was also driving a certain vehicle, to-wit, a certain Buick coupe, which was occupied by said Charles Brown and one Mrs. C. L. Brown, on said highway; that said vehicle so driven by said Jim Lee…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Commonwealth v. HorsfallMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1913
- People v. OdomCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937
- Scott v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1921
- State v. MastersWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1928
- Olson v. StateArizona Supreme Court · 1930
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- State v. PorrasCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1980
- State v. SzarekSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1981
- State v. PorrasCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1982
- State v. FosterCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2024
- United States v. EaglesonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1954