Legal Opinion
Federal Deposit Insurance v. Stahl
District Court, S.D. Florida
Decided May 27, 1994No. 91-7122Published
1Opinion of the Court
OMNIBUS ORDER ON DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS FOR DIRECTED VERDICT, MOTION FOR MISTRIAL AND MOTION TO DISMISS FOR MISCONDUCT
(AMENDED ORDER)
FERGUSON, District Judge.
All of the defendants made motions for directed verdicts pursuant to Rule 50, Federal Rule of Civil Procedure, at the conclusion of the plaintiffs case, Because of the posture of the case when assigned to the undersigned judge, ruling was reserved. The motion was renewed at the conclusion of all the evidence, and ruling was again reserved to allow the jury to pass on the factual question, and to obviate the need for a new trial in the event…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Johnny Vineyard v. County of Murray, Georgia, Bill Hansird, as Former Sheriff of Murray County, Monte Chastain, Robert BishopCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1993
- International Insurance Co., a Corporation v. Alfred M. Johns, James W. McFadden Thomas v. Ogletree, Richard W. Sherman, and G. Paul WhortonCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1989
- Cottle v. Storer Communication, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1988
- AmeriFirst Bank v. BomarDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 1991
- Allstate Insurance Company v. Norman J. James and Vera M. JamesCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1988
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.