Watts v. Pettit's heirs
Court of Appeals of Kentucky
CASE 43 — PETITION EQUITY APPEAL FROM FAYETTE CIRCUIT COURT, CITED— 5 /. J. M., 618; Wilborne vs. Commonwealth. 1 Dana, 514; Johnson vs. Fuquay. Act of 1797; 1 Statute Law, 770. Sec. 15, art. 1, chap. 43, Revised Statutes. Sec. 3, chap. 97, Revised Statutes. Act of March, 1856. Sec. 10, art. 2, chap. 43, Revised Statutes. Sec. 25, art. 1, chap. 37, Revised Statutes.
Read the full summary
CASE 43 — PETITION EQUITY APPEAL FROM FAYETTE CIRCUIT COURT, CITED— 5 /. J. M., 618; Wilborne vs. Commonwealth. 1 Dana, 514; Johnson vs. Fuquay. Act of 1797; 1 Statute Law, 770. Sec. 15, art. 1, chap. 43, Revised Statutes. Sec. 3, chap. 97, Revised Statutes. Act of March, 1856. Sec. 10, art. 2, chap. 43, Revised Statutes. Sec. 25, art. 1, chap. 37, Revised Statutes. CITED— 1 Revised Statutes, pp. 581-2. CITED— 5 /. J. M., 618. 1 Dana, 514. 1 Morehead CITED— 5 J. J. M., 618; Wilborne vs. Commonwealth. 1 Dana, 514; Johnson vs. Fuquay. ■ Act of 1856; Revised Statutes, 581-2.
1Opinion of the Court
CHIEE JUSTICE PETEES
delivered the opinion op the court :
Armstead Blackwell was appointed by the Fayette county court in 1858 guardian for Sarah H. and Mary J. Pettit, infant children of James 0. Pettit, deceased, and executed bond, with Neal McCann and Garrett Watts his sureties.
At the May term, 1861, of said court, on the motion of Watts to be released from his obligation as the surety of Blackwell, a new bond was executed by Blackwell, with Neal McCann alone as his surety, the court having accepted him as such, and thereupon made the following order: “It is further, ordered and adjudged…
2Cited by3 opinions
- United States v. HoggCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1902
- McKim v. BlakeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1882
- United States v. HoggDistrict Court, W.D. Kentucky · 1901