Legal Opinion

Carson v. Jersey City Insurance

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided June 15, 1881PublishedCited by 11 opinions

On case certified from Mercer Circuit.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Depue, J.

The suit was tried at the Circuit until the evidence was in, and then the trial was, by consent of counsel, suspended, that questions of law might be heard before the Supreme Court.

The premises insured, consisted of a flouring mill, engine and machinery, situate in-the county of Mercer. The insurance was negotiated with Thomas C. Pearce, an agent of the company, residing at Hightstown, in said county. The policy bears date January 8th, 1880. In it is written the direction, “ Loss, if any, payable to Israel Baldwin, mortgagee.” The fire…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Trustees of the First Baptist Ch. v. . Brooklyn Fire Ins.New York Court of Appeals · 1859
  2. Jennings v. Chenango Mutual InsuranceNew York Supreme Court · 1846
  3. Hartford Fire Insurance v. WalshIllinois Supreme Court · 1870
  4. Commercial Insurance v. SpanknebleIllinois Supreme Court · 1869
  5. Franklin Fire Insurance v. Chicago Ice Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1872

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Mattia v. Northern Ins. Co. of New YorkNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1955
  2. American Paint Service, Inc. v. The Home Insurance Company Of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1957
  3. Home Insurance Company v. CohenCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1962
  4. Hayes v. Federal Shipbuilding Dry Dock Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1949
  5. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. Cooper Park Development Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1948

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API