Metz v. Hoffman
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Parker, J.,
In a proceeding under the Act of March 8, 1889, P. L. 10, as amended April 16, 1903, P. L. 212 (12 PS §1543, et seq.), to compel the bringing of an action of ejectment for, or to quiet the title to a tract of land containing 199 perches, the respondent, Richard J. Hoffman, claimant, did not answer the rule to show cause why ejectment should not be brought, but he did bring an action of ejectment five days after the expiration of a period of six months from the date of the service of the rule and before the rule was made absolute or judgment was entered against respondent…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Fuel City Mfg. Co. v. Waynesburg Products Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1920
- In re Foster's PetitionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1914
- Bordentown Banking Co. v. ResteinSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1906
- Bennethum v. Bowers, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Berks County1890
- Notley's PetitionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1919
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Vision Service Plan v. Pennsylvania AFSCME Health & Welfare FundSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
- Hoffman v. New Jersey Federation of Young Men's & Young Women's Hebrew Ass'nsCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1939
- Hoffman v. MetzDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1940
- Paslawski (Et Al.) v. BorysSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
- New Jersey Federation of Young Men's & Young Women's Hebrew Ass'ns v. HoffmanDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1939
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.