Legal Opinion

Brehm v. Liebenberg & Kaplan

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided May 4, 1928No. 26,693PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

Certiorari to review an order of the industrial commission.

Relator, Otto Brehm, was an employe of respondent Liebenberg & Kaplan. He was accidentally injured January 20, 1927. His employers furnished medical treatment and care and paid him compensation up to July 25, 1927. Compensation was then discontinued on the ground that relator had fully recovered from the injury and the disability therefrom had ceased. Proper notice was given, and the matter of further compensation was heard before a referee. Relator claimed that disability from the accident and injury continued, and asked that…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Reardon v. City of AustinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1928

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Chesler v. City of MinneapolisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1932
  2. Merchants Trust Co. v. G. Sommers & Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1937

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API