Legal Opinion

Crider v. Balkcom

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided November 17, 1948No. 16422PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Atkinson, Presiding Justice.

(After stating the foregoing facts.) It is insisted by Crider that, having served the minimum of a felony sentence and having been granted a conditional release, the only way the terms of that release could be violated would be by the commission by him of another felony.

Code § 27-2502, after providing for an indeterminate sentence, states: “The Prison Commission [now the Board of Pardons and Paroles] shall fix rules by which said convict, after serving the minimum sentence, may be allowed to complete his term without the confines of the penitentiary upon complying…

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. Balkcom v. SellersSupreme Court of Georgia · 1964

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API