Legal Opinion

People v. Beckles

New York Supreme Court

Decided March 8, 1982PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Harold J. Rothwax, J.

The question presented is to what extent must the ultimate cause of death be foreseeable before a person may be charged with criminally negligent homicide (Penal Law, § 125.10), and what quality of evidence of foreseeability is legally sufficient to sustain a charge of criminal negligence. (CPL 210.20, subd 1, par [b]; 70.10, subd 1.) The facts presented before the Grand Jury are that the defendant (approximately 30 years of age, 5 feet, 10 inches tall and heavyset) struck the deceased (54 years old, 5 feet, 6 inches tall and weighing a slight 80…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. People v. KibbeNew York Court of Appeals · 1974
  2. People v. Warner-Lambert Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1980
  3. People v. HaneyNew York Court of Appeals · 1972
  4. People v. StanfieldNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
  5. People v. BeardAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1980

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. People v. ErbyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
  2. People v. JohnsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API