Legal Opinion

State v. Ransom

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided May 20, 1986No. 8612SC33PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HEDRICK, Chief Judge.

Defendant contends that G.S. 15A-1335 and G.S. 15A-1340.4 prohibited the trial court from sentencing defendant to more than ten years imprisonment. G.S. 15A-1335, which generally embodies the holding in North Carolina v. Pearce, 395 U.S. 711, 89 S.Ct. 2072, 23 L.Ed. 2d 656 (1969), provides as follows:

When a conviction or sentence imposed in superior court has been set aside on direct review or collateral attack, the court may not impose a new sentence for the same offense, or for a different offense based on the same conduct, which is more severe than the prior sentence…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. North Carolina v. PearceSupreme Court of the United States · 1969

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. State v. HagansCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2008
  2. State v. DortonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2007
  3. State v. MoffittCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2007
  4. State v. OliverCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2002
  5. State v. HarrisCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1994

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API