State v. Ransom
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
HEDRICK, Chief Judge.
Defendant contends that G.S. 15A-1335 and G.S. 15A-1340.4 prohibited the trial court from sentencing defendant to more than ten years imprisonment. G.S. 15A-1335, which generally embodies the holding in North Carolina v. Pearce, 395 U.S. 711, 89 S.Ct. 2072, 23 L.Ed. 2d 656 (1969), provides as follows:
When a conviction or sentence imposed in superior court has been set aside on direct review or collateral attack, the court may not impose a new sentence for the same offense, or for a different offense based on the same conduct, which is more severe than the prior sentence…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- North Carolina v. PearceSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
3Cited by10 opinions
- State v. HagansCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2008
- State v. DortonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2007
- State v. MoffittCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2007
- State v. OliverCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2002
- State v. HarrisCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1994
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.