Legal Opinion

Peter Castellana and Pride Wholesale Meat & Poultry Corp. v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided May 22, 1967No. 454, Docket 31150PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

IRVING R. KAUFMAN, Circuit Judge:

Based in the main on conclusory epithets without benefit of factual basis, Peter Castellana and Pride Wholesale Meat & Poultry Co. (Pride) appeal from an order by Judge Bonsai denying without a hearing their motion, made pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255, to set aside their judgments of conviction which this Court previously affirmed in United States v. Castellana, 349 F.2d 264 (2d Cir. 1965), cert. denied, 383 U.S. 928, 86 S.Ct. 935, 15 L.Ed.2d 847 (1966). 1

The appellants, along with 5 other defendants, were convicted by a jury after . a six-week trial, of…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. United States v. Salvatore AnnunziatoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1961
  2. United States v. Louis A. Marchisio, John H. Seiter and W. Ward WhippleCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1965
  3. United States v. RosenbergCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1952
  4. United States v. WalkerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1952
  5. United States v. SpadaforaCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1952

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. William Barton v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1986
  2. State v. MateraSupreme Court of Florida · 1972
  3. Carmine Panico and Carlie Dipietro, Movants-Appellants v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1969
  4. Anthony Giacalone v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1984
  5. Leon Bearden v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API