Legal Opinion

Rizkalla v. Abusamra

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided October 25, 1933PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCrosby, J.

This is an action of contract in which the plaintiff seeks to recover $2,000 and interest on an alleged accounting between the defendant and the plaintiff’s assignor, one Elias Ghiz. The declaration is upon an account annexed, which sets forth “Sum agreed upon after accounting” $2,000, interest $280, making a total of $2,280. The answer was a general denial and payment. An amended answer pleaded the statute of frauds, G. L. (Ter. Ed.) c. 106, § 6, and G. L. (Ter. Ed.) c. 259, § 1, as a defence.

At the trial there was evidence tending to show that Ghiz, the assignor of the plaintiff, and the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Chace v. TraffordMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1875
  2. Braman v. FossMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1910
  3. Tucker v. Columbian National Life InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1919
  4. Buxton v. EdwardsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1883
  5. Millen v. WilliamsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1912

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Memishian v. PhippsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1942
  2. Air Safety, Inc. v. Roman Catholic Archbishop of BostonCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1996
  3. Berwin v. LevensonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1942
  4. Milliken v. WarwickMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1940
  5. Newburgh v. FLORSHEIM SHOE COMPANYDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1961

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API