Legal Opinion

Pechersky v. Queens Surface Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 31, 2005PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*843In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the plaintiffs appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (LeVine, J.), dated October 7, 2004, as denied that branch of their motion which was for a unified trial on the issues of liability and damages.

Ordered that the order is reversed insofar as appealed from, on the law and as a matter of discretion, with costs, and that branch of the plaintiffs’ motion which was for a unified trial on the issues of liability and damages is granted.

The infant plaintiff and his mother commenced…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Noseworthy v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1948
  2. Lind v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
  3. DeGregorio v. Lutheran Medical CenterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
  4. Vazquez v. Costco Companies, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Galarza v. Crown Container Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
  2. D'Amato v. YapAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
  3. Marisova v. Collins-BrewsterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API