Tavares Grove Care v. Simmons
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Opinion of the Court
ERVIN, Judge.
In this workers’ compensation appeal, the employer/earrier raises four points from the order entered. We affirm as to the first two points raised, finding competent and substantial evidence supporting the order as it relates to those two asserted errors. As to the fourth point, alleging error in awarding claimant costs, interest and attorney’s fees, we note that the deputy retained jurisdiction only for that purpose, hence that portion of the order is not yet final and will not be considered by us in this appeal. See Mills Electrical Contractors v. Marthens, et al., 417 So.2d 700…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- MILLS ELECTRICAL CONT. v. MarthensDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1982
- Willard Kaufman Co. v. RawlingsDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1982
- Lake Highland Nursing Home v. EverettDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1981
- Fowler Harvesting v. ThompsonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1981
3Cited by3 opinions
- Emro Marketing v. SchwierDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1996
- Carnegie Gardens v. MizeDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1989
- City of Miami v. GrenkaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1982