McClaskey v. Barr
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Ohio
In Equity. On hearing upon the answer of Heberger’s heirs to the cross bill of Samuel Barr et al.
1Opinion of the Court
SAGE, District Judge.
The defendants Michael Heberger et al., sole heirs at law of Francis Heberger, deceased, were brought into this cause as parties and coparceners after the interlocutory decree for partition was entered. They present to the court, for consideration de novo, the following questions, involving the rights of devisees under the will of Robert Barr, deceased;
I. When did the testator, Robert Barr, die? Mary Jane Barr— to whom the real estate, partition whereof is sought, descended from *783William Barr, Sr. — died November 27, 1821, and the estate then vested in the surviving…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Vernon v. . VernonNew York Court of Appeals · 1873
- Given v. HiltonSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
- United States v. GomezSupreme Court of the United States · 1860
- Dixon v. City of CincinnatiOhio Supreme Court · 1846
- Peck v. SandersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1855
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.