Legal Opinion

Forrester v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.

District Court, N.D. Georgia

Decided October 8, 1979No. Civ. A. C79-102APublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

TIDWELL, District Judge.

Defendant in the above-styled matter has filed a motion for summary judgment, asserting that there is no genuine issue as to any material fact relative to Plaintiff’s claim against Defendant and that Defendant is entitled to summary judgment as a matter of law. In deciding whether to grant summary judgment, the Court “must draw inferences most favorable to the party opposing the motion, and take care that no party will be improperly deprived of a trial of disputed factual issues.” United States Steel Corp. v. Darby, 516 F.2d 961, 963 (5th Cir. 1975).

Defendant…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Guaranty Trust Co. v. YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  3. United States Steel Corp. v. Elton H. Darby, Defendant-Third Party v. Southern Fabricating Company, Inc., Third PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1975
  4. Stanley v. Sterling Mutual Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1913
  5. Johnson v. Georgia Farm Bureau Mutual InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1977

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Brookins v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.District Court, S.D. Georgia · 1982
  2. Dittler Bros., Inc. v. Allendale Mut. Ins. Co.District Court, N.D. Georgia · 1981

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API