Legal Opinion
Coleman & Kraus v. Board of Education
New York Supreme Court
Decided August 15, 1912Published
Action to foreclose liens.
1Opinion of the CourtPage, J.
The -principal legal question involved in this case arises in relation to the liens of the defendants Alfred *505and Julius James. This action was commenced by the plaintiff and a Us pendens filed, and the defendants James filed their answer prior to the expiration of three months from the date of the filing of their liens but they did not file a Us pendens in their own behalf.
The Appellate Division in this department has recently held (Bradley & Sons v. Huber Co., 146 App. Div. 630), where defendants failed to file a Us pendens within three months of the filing of the notice of lien, the lien…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Berger Manufacturing Co. v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1912
- Brace v. . City of GloversvilleNew York Court of Appeals · 1901
- Bradley v. Henry Huber Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1911
- Danziger v. . SimonsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
- J. J. Newman Lumber Co. v. WempleNew York Supreme Court · 1907