Legal Opinion

Hudson Ins. Co. v. Yameen

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided June 3, 1931No. 22509PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

It is ordered and adjudged by this court that the judgment of the said Court of Appeals be, and the same is hereby, affirmed for the reason that the insurance policy involved herein contains language reasonably susceptible to different interpretations and hence will be given the construction most favorable to the assured. Farmers National Bank v. Delaware Insurance Co., 83 Ohio St., 309; Mumaw v. Western & Southern Life Insurance Co., 97 Ohio St., 1; Great American Mutual Indemnity Co. v. Jones, 111 Ohio St., 84.

Judgment affirmed.

Marshall, C. J., Matthias, Day, Allen, Kinkade and Robinson,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Great American Mutual Indemnity Co. v. JonesOhio Supreme Court · 1924

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Preferred Acc. Ins. v. RhodenbaughCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1947

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API