Vannoy v. Uniroyal Tire Co.
Idaho Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
726 P.2d 648 (1985)
111 Idaho 536
Jerry VANNOY and Nadine Vannoy, husband and wife, Plaintiffs-Respondents, Cross appellants,
v.
UNIROYAL TIRE COMPANY, Defendant-Appellant, Cross Respondent.
No. 15529.
Supreme Court of Idaho.
November 22, 1985.
On Rehearing September 10, 1986.
Thomas B. High of Benoit, Alexander & Sinclair, Twin Falls, for defendant-appellant, cross respondent.
Kenneth L. Pedersen of Webb, Burton, Carlson, Pederson & Paine, Twin Falls, for plaintiffs-respondents, cross appellants.
BAKES, Justice.
Uniroyal, a tire manufacturer has appealed from a judgment awarding damages to plaintiffs in…
Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part · Huntley; Concurring in part, dissenting in part · Bistline; Dissent; Concurrence.
2Cases cited52 opinions
- Duncan v. Cessna Aircraft Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1984
- Suter v. San Angelo Foundry & MacHine CompanySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1979
- Daly v. General Motors Corp.California Supreme Court · 1978
- Kirkland v. General Motors CorporationSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1974
- Dippel v. ScianoWisconsin Supreme Court · 1967
47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.